As I read the news reports of the last few days, I observe that the Thackerays-for-Mumbai campaign taking up maximum column centimeters in most publications.
From the looks of it the fracas has started again.
While I might just understand from where the concern initially stemmed, this issue is now heading somewhere else – completely. And I don’t think, that by either their actions or statements, the Shiv Sena is garnering any credibility. I really don’t think that any Indian believes in them, apart from their’ yes-men’ of course.
Well for starters, point one – they launched an attack on SRK. Umm…how did they miss out on the ‘Aman ki Asha’ campaign? I mean are they doing selective targeting here? This publication got Pakistani artists to perform in India, and Shiv Sena didn’t as much as murmur.
So why SRK now? What’s the basis? If SRK feels that Pak players need to be included in his team – that’s his opinion and he is entitled to it. He does not need to apologise. We as Indians might take affront to it and not agree to his stand (some out of loyalty). But we may not deliberate on a campaign to ostracize him for that. If freedom of expression is a crime, then the Thackerays should be the first to go.
Point two, when finally, finally some from the Centre took a stand to this one-sided hooliganism, for lack of a better point, the nationality of his mum and his bachelorhood was raised. How very mature and such pertinent points to make. Looks like Mr. Bal Thackeray surely hasn’t grown wise with his years. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi maybe born an Italian, but today she is as much of an Indian as you and I. We might not agree with her political decisions, but there is no denying her or her sons’ capability.
I really think that we are losing focus of the big picture here. Where are these statements stemming from? What is the moot cause of this Maharashtra-Marathi-Manoos campaign? And more importantly what makes the Thackerays’ tick?
Come to think of it, if India collectively joined forces to shut them up, who says we couldn’t make progress? What is stopping us? Maybe our leaders are too busy forging alliances and hatching plots to pause and take a look at this cancer. What they don’t realize, that if continued unabated, this could very well lead to our death as a free society.
Already we are plagued by various societal evils. But we need to take a stand somewhere.
Sure we are a clannish society by nature. Bongs stick with Bongs, Gults with Gults and so on. It’s the way we are wired. But our USP is our diversity. Language or state-of-origin is not what we should be bickering on, rather leveraging.
You cannot stand in assembly and slap an MP and make him aplogise for not speaking in Marathi. You cannot ban people from saying Bombay. Logically speaking you can, but may not. How do we as a nation enforce a ‘may not’ situation?
There is an excellent movie, ‘The Lives of Others’, chronicling the loss of free expression in the cultural society of East Berlin by the country’s secret police. It is a terrifying scenario, where even within the walls of our own house we are not free to voice our opinions, not free to trust the ones we love for the fear of betrayal, not free to be ourselves.
If this mayhem continues unabated, we Indians may well be headed in that direction.
If, in my own land, I am not free to say what I feel and what I think, I cannot help but wonder, that at some level, maybe, even our Freedom Struggle was futile.